|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Aerial of NTC Main Base |
From World War II until the 1990’s, the area now known as Baldwin Park was used for military purposes. When the Orlando Army Air Station was established in 1942, it actually included an area much larger than what we now know as the Naval Training Center (NTC) Main Base. The Air Station also included areas now developed as the Audubon Park neighborhood, the Fashion Square Mall, Koger Office Center and other surrounding properties, in addition to what is now Orlando Executive Airport. |
|
After World War II the Orlando Executive Airport property was returned to the City of Orlando, and the Audubon Park, Fashion Square Mall, Koger Center and other properties were sold as the Air Station gradually reduced its operations. In the early 1960’s the Air Station closed its doors, and the remaining property was turned over to the Navy for use as the country’s third Naval Training Center. Over the next three decades NTC Orlando served as the training site of over 650,000 Navy Recruits. The Main Base property was home to three major commands: the Recruit Training Command, the Service School Command, and the Nuclear Power School.
NTC Closure & Reuse The base closure and redevelopment planning process was a community based, proactive planning approach that established direction for redevelopment and reuse of the NTC facilities and properties. The effort consisted of four stages: 1) Base Reuse Plan; 2) Business and Development Plan; 3) Urban Design Vision Plan, and; 4) Selection of a development team. |
|
|
Base Reuse Plan |
![]() Original Base Reuse Plan |
|
It took approximately eleven months to develop the Base Reuse Plan. A thorough inventory of the physical, environmental, and economic conditions of the NTC property and the surrounding neighborhoods had to be performed. This assessment lead to the identification of the site's opportunities and constraints and the development of goals and objectives for the Base's reuse. Several land use plans that would achieve the established goals and objectives were evaluated. The approved Base Reuse Plan was used by the Department of the Navy as the basis in preparing their Environmental Impact Statement. Throughout the entire process, public comments were solicited and incorporated into the plan. Local residents were kept informed through public forums, newsletters, committee meetings, newspaper articles and television news broadcasts.
Urban Design Vision Plan |
|
|
|
The Vision
Plan presented a complete development concept. The Plan
provided for balanced long-term growth with approximately
3,000 residential units and over 2,700,000 square feet of
office/commercial use at buildout. A pedestrian oriented
village center, that included retail, office, and high density
residential uses, surrounded by high density residential areas
was the focus. The two lakes on the site were cited as public
space and an open space corridor linked the lakes with parks
and other open space areas, thereby connecting it with
wildlife corridors in the surrounding areas. |
|
Selecting a Development Team for the NTC
With a clear vision in mind,
the City now sought a development team that would understand
and implement that vision. Four nationally recognized
development teams were short-listed for simultaneous
negotiations. The four teams included such national developers
as Post Properties, Pulte Home Corp., Haile Plantation Group,
The Arvida Company, The Rouse Company, WCI Communities and
Cali Realty Corp.
Conveyance With a development team in place, the City of Orlando intensified efforts to acquire the Naval Training Center property from the Navy. On October 27, 1999, six years after the Navy announced the closure, the City Council voted unanimously to purchase the property from the Navy and moments later voted to sell the property to Orlando NTC Partners. Under the terms of the agreement, the City would pay the Navy $1.2 million plus 75 percent of the price paid by Orlando NTC Partners. In addition, the developer was required to make a one-time payment of $3.5 million to a local Homeless Provider Trust Fund. By selling the property to one developer, the City could eliminate blighted conditions and create a tremendous amount of taxable value. In addition, the redevelopment would create 200 acres of parks and open 250 acres of lakes to the public. Another 90 acres would remain as out-parcels for various federal operations, leaving only about 550 acres of developable property for new streets, parcels and lots. |
|
|
|
The sale to one developer also reflected the complexities of
redeveloping a former military base. Before
any new construction could begin, the developer first had to
clear the site of 256 buildings (4.5 million square feet),
excavate 25 miles of substandard roads and 200 miles of
underground utilities, and remove contaminated soil discovered
on the greens of the base golf course – at a cost of about
$40 million. |
|
Concrete and masonry materials from demolished buildings were crushed on-site and recycled in a massive underground stormwater filtration system and as road base for new public streets. Reusing 750,000 tons of recycled concrete on-site eliminated the 40,000 truck trips it would have taken to transport waste materials to a landfill. A pair of federal lawsuits filed by a local resident further complicated redevelopment of the NTC property. The resident claimed that the Navy did not follow the proper procedures when it offered the land and buildings to other federal agencies. The first lawsuit died when the appellant missed a deadline for filing a petition in U.S. Supreme Court. An appeals court dismissed the second lawsuit. |
|
|
The Land Use Program, Land Use Plan and Regulatory Plan were all based on the Conceptual Development Plan submitted by the developer during the development team selection process. The PD Ordinance indicates that these documents would need to be modified when detailed plans were submitted for review during the development approval process. Several non-substantial amendments to each document have been approved over the years. |
|
|
|
![]() Land Use Plan - View Large Format PDF Version |
|
Land Use Plan - The Land Use Plan divides the PD into broad land use categories, including mixed use, office/mixed use, swing, attached housing, detached housing, civic, and open space. Development within the PD must be consistent with the uses shown on the Land Use Plan. Regulatory Plan - The Regulatory Plan further divides the PD into character districts, including Village Center Core, Village Center General, Neighborhood Center, and Neighborhood General. Each district has specific development standards, architectural standards, permitted uses and prohibited uses. Additional standards are also provided for civic uses and for development within a Campus Overlay Zone and a Park Edge Overlay Zone. Development within the PD must be consistent with the development standards provided for the applicable character district.
Development Approvals |
|
|
(1) Neighborhood Master Plan - The PD is generally divided into seven Neighborhood Master Plan areas: 1) the Westside Neighborhoods Package One, 2) the Westside Neighborhoods Package Two, 3) the Westside Neighborhoods Package Three, 4) the Eastside Neighborhoods, 5) the Village Center Neighborhood, 6) the Neighborhood Business District, and 7) the Lake Susannah Neighborhoods. Each Neighborhood Master Plan Area may be platted as one or more units and may include multifamily or non-residential parcels that are subject to further review as a Specific Parcel Master Plan. (2) Subdivision Plats - Subdivision Plats are reviewed for consistency with the approved Neighborhood Plan. Individual lots and parcels may be sold and purchased once the Final Subdivision Plat is approved, signed and recorded in accordance with state law. (3)Specific Parcel Master Plans - Multifamily, office, retail and civic uses are approved individually as Specific Parcel Master Plans. Individual buildings must conform to the standards of the underlying character district depicted on the Regulatory Plan. |
|
|
Residential Design Guidelines - The Baldwin Park PD does not require any specific architectural style. However, Residential Design Guidelines have been adopted for each neighborhood. These guidelines provide specific standards for six architectural styles to ensure that the details of each building are consistent with the architectural style selected. The guidelines also include 'anti-monotony' regulations that require a seven-lot separation between homes that have the same body massing. The guidelines are intended to "create a harmonious neighborhood environment without becoming sterile or monotonous." |
![]() Example of Massing Guidelines Graphic |
|
Parks |
|
|
On January 9, 2006, the City Council approved a City Parks Development and Reimbursement Agreement.Under the terms of the agreement, the developer was allowed to contract for the design and construction of City parks within the PD. The purpose of the agreement was to speed the design and construction of park improvements and reduce costs by utilizing contractors already under contract or actively engaged in construction activities at Baldwin Park. |
|
|
PD Amendments |
|
![]()