| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2001 LAKEWATER QUALITY REPORT
INTRODUCTION The
City of Orlando currently contains 104 named water bodies that lie within
five (5) major drainage basins. Eighty-one
of the water bodies are lakes with natural origins and the remaining 23
were excavated as borrow pits or stormwater ponds.
In 1990, a lake-monitoring program was instituted in which water
quality analysis and field data collection was performed on 78 City lakes.
The City has continued to collect quarterly data on each City Lake
since 1990 as an ongoing lake monitoring program, which has expanded in
the number of lakes sampled due to annexations.
The current policy for sampling lakes is to collect data on all
natural lakes. Some manmade
water bodies are also sampled if there is significant public access such
as an adjacent park. This is the twelfth annual water quality report
presented since the monitoring program began.
The purpose of the monitoring program is to establish ambient
water quality conditions, identify lakes with potential water quality
problems, and to increase our knowledge of the chemical/physical processes
that occur in our lakes. Water
quality data is used to detect water quality trends and to evaluate the
effectiveness of lake restoration projects and stormwater management
practices.
The water quality database was greatly expanded because of the
City’s involvement with the University of Florida's LAKEWATCH program,
which began in 1991. The
LAKEWATCH program involves citizen volunteers who become involved in their
lake’s management by collecting monthly field data and water samples.
LAKEWATCH volunteers collected data from 36 City lakes during 2001.
Orange County Environmental Protection Department provides
quarterly data for 24 City lakes, which is also used in this report.
Data presented in the 2001 Water Quality Report is based on a total
of 655 sampling events on 91 lakes, which is an average of
7.2 sampling events per lake.
As part of the monitoring program, a database for water quality was
created in 1990. Many of the City lakes had never been monitored prior to
the 1990 City’s monitoring program. Other lakes had historical data that
was collected by Orange County Environmental Protection Department, but no
recent data. All current data
is entered into the database that contains historical data collected by
the City of Orlando, Orange County and LAKEWATCH volunteers.
A Lake Water Quality database is maintained by the Stormwater
Utility Bureau and is made available to anyone interested in the
historical and current water quality of any City lake.
An individual data sheet for each lake can be found in Appendix III. Information provided for each lake includes: surface area, drainage basin area, mean depth, lake volume, historic and current water levels, drainage basin land uses, if the lake contains aeration and/or grass carp and whether the lake is natural or manmade. In addition to physical data, the lake data sheets provide current and long-term water quality data including a graph, which indicates water quality trends over time for each lake. Bathymetric maps, which detail the contours of the lake bottoms, are also provided for 60 City lakes. METHODS
AND MATERIALS Water
quality samples taken by the City were collected in the pelagic (open
water) zone. All samples were
collected by submerging a sample bottle to elbow depth (approximately 0.5
m). Approximately half the samples were collected using a composite
method. This means that a lake would be divided into stations and
half of the sample would be collected at one station while the other half
would be collected at another station.
This method produces more representative results than collecting a
single sample for each lake and is more cost effective than collecting
multiple samples and averaging the data.
Lake size and configuration were considered when deciding the
number of samples to collect per lake.
Some lakes were sampled and treated as two separate lakes in this
report. The reasoning was that even though the water bodies had the same
name, they were sufficiently isolated to have different chemical
characteristics. For example,
values for Lake Estelle were reported as Lake Estelle East and Lake
Estelle West. Lake Ivanhoe,
Lake Cay Dee, and Lake Lucerne were also treated in this manner.
LAKEWATCH samples were collected by citizen volunteers at three
open water stations per sampling event, then the data was averaged for
each event. LAKEWATCH samples
were collected by submerging a sample bottle to elbow depth.
Orange County samples were collected at a single station in the
lake’s center by submerging a sample bottle to elbow depth.
A State-certified private laboratory using EPA approved methods
performed water quality analyses on all City-collected samples.
The quarterly parameters analyzed for each lake and method
reference are as follows: pH (EPA 150.1), alkalinity (EPA 310.1),
biochemical oxygen demand (EPA 405.1), total phosphorus (EPA 365.2), ortho
phosphorus (EPA 365.2), total nitrogen (TKN + NO3/NO2), ammonia nitrogen
(EPA 350.1), nitrate nitrogen (EPA 300.A), nitrite nitrogen (EPA 300.A),
total Kjeldahl nitrogen (EPA 351.2), total suspended solids (EPA160.2),
volatile suspended solids (EPA 160.4), total dissolved solids (EPA 160.1),
chlorophyll-a (SM 10200H ACID CORR) and fecal coliform (SM9222D).
Orange County samples were analyzed for the above-mentioned
parameters by their state certified Environmental Protection Department
laboratory. LAKEWATCH samples were analyzed at the University of Florida's
laboratory for total phosphorus, total nitrogen, and chlorophyll-a.
Field data was collected using a model 600XL Multi-Parameter YSI
Sonde. Water quality
parameters measured were temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, specific
conductivity, and oxidation-reduction potential.
These parameters were measured at 0.5 meters, and then at one (1)
meter intervals in the water column until the bottom was reached.
The YSI was calibrated before and after each day’s sampling
event.
Mean
depth data was determined for approximately half of lakes by running a
transect for each lake along the maximum berth with a Lowrance X -16
recording fathometer and averaging the depths.
Sufficient bathymetric data was available for the remaining lakes
to calculate a more accurate mean depth by dividing the lakes volume by
surface area.
Water elevation data was retrieved from City Survey records that
contain a long-term database of monthly lake elevation measurements. The mean high water mark was derived statistically from
monthly data, by calculating one standard deviation above the mean. Lake
origin information was determined from the United States Department of
Interior National Wetland Inventory Maps.
CURRENT
TROPHIC STATES The
water quality of a Florida lake is commonly assessed by determining the
trophic state of a lake.
The trophic state is a measure of the degree of productivity in the
water column.
Eutrophication is the process in which a lake becomes nutrient
enriched, which in turn, alters the chemical, physical and biological
characteristics of the lake.
Most of the changes in lake’s characteristics result from
increased plant production, which is in turn caused by increased levels of
nutrients.
Since most water quality problems associated with Florida lakes can
be attributed to eutrophication, trophic state measurements are used by
the City as the primary indicator to detect changes over time and to rank
lakes by water quality.
The City uses the Florida Trophic State Index (Brezonik 1984),
which was derived using data from 313 Florida lakes. The trophic state of
a lake is determined by measuring key water quality parameters and
entering these values into an empirical formula, which calculates a
numeric value.
The parameters used to determine the trophic state of a lake are
total nitrogen, total phosphorus, chlorophyll-a (measures planktonic
algae densities), and secchi depth (measures water transparency).
These parameters are all correlated, and the index allows for a
better measure of overall trophic state than using individual indicators.
The index calculates a number that can be assigned to a particular trophic
state.
A lake, which has low nutrient concentrations in the water column,
will typically have good water transparency because the algae densities
are low.
These lakes are termed oligotrophic and are generally considered as
having excellent water quality.
Oligotrophic lakes tend to be deep with abundant oxygen and a small
amount of organic material on the bottom.
Lakes were assigned an oligotrophic status if Trophic State Index
values were less than 50.
During 2001, 30.7% of City lakes were considered oligotrophic using
this criterion.
As nutrient concentrations increase in a lake, algae density
increases and water transparency decreases.
A lake with high levels of nutrients and planktonic algae is termed
eutrophic.
Eutrophic lakes are highly productive and will have the potential
for water quality problems resulting from severe algae blooms that can
deplete oxygen and form mucky organic layers on the lake bottom.
Lakes were assigned a eutrophic status if Trophic State Index
values were between 61 and 70.
During 2001, the percent of City lakes with eutrophic conditions
was 23.1%.
Lakes with moderate nutrient levels and water quality
characteristics between oligotrophic and eutrophic conditions are termed
mesotrophic.
Mesotrophic lakes will typically only have occasional water quality
problems and are generally considered to have good water quality.
Lakes were assigned a mesotrophic status if trophic state index
values were between 50 and 60.
During 2001, the percent of City lakes with mesotrophic conditions
was 39.6%.
Lakes that have reached advanced stages of the eutrophication
process are termed hypereutrophic.
Persistent algae blooms, extreme fluctuations in dissolved oxygen
and deep organic muck layers, characterize these lakes.
Hypereutrophic lakes in the City tend to be shallow and have mucky
sediments from organic material, which is produced in the lake faster than
it can be removed by decomposition processes.
Lakes were assigned a hypereutrophic status if Trophic State Index
values were greater than 70.
During 2001, the percent of City lakes exhibiting hypereutrophic
conditions was 6.6 %.
The Florida Department of Environmental Protection uses Trophic
State Index values to assign a good, fair or poor rating to Florida lakes.
Trophic State Index values between 0 and 59 correspond to good
water quality, 60‑69 is fair and values 70 or greater indicate poor
water quality (Hand et al,
1990). Using
these criteria, the majority (67.0%) of City lakes have good water
quality, 24.2% have fair water quality and 8.8% have poor water quality.
Trophic State Index values resulting from the monitoring program
indicates that a wide variability in trophic conditions is present in City
lakes. Trophic
State Index values ranged from 22 for Lake Nona to 81 for Lake Kozart,
based on average annual data for the 91 lakes surveyed (Table
1).
While the process of a lake going from an oligotrophic to a
eutrophic state is a natural occurrence, human impact on the lake drainage
basin can greatly accelerate this process.
When the eutrophication process is accelerated due to human
activity such as urbanization, the process is termed cultural
eutrophication.
Since most water quality problems in Florida can be attributed to
cultural eutrophication, the majority of pollution abatement and lake
restoration methods attempt to reverse this process through nutrient
removal or inactivation. In the City of Orlando, the major source of
nutrients and other pollutants entering lakes originates from stormwater
runoff. Since
stormwater is recognized as a major source of pollution, Orlando has
adopted strict requirements for on-site stormwater treatment and is active
in retrofitting public stormwater systems to provide treatment of
stormwater runoff.
The fact that a lake is eutrophic does not necessarily mean the
condition is man‑made and/or undesirable.
Many Florida lakes are eutrophic because of naturally occurring
high nutrient concentrations in the soils of the watershed.
Water quality can be a matter of individual perspective and depend
on primary uses for the lake.
For example, an oligotrophic lake would be desirable to individuals
who swim or ski while a eutrophic lake is more productive and will tend to
support larger populations of fish and wildlife for anglers and bird
watchers.
One factor that the Florida Trophic State Index does not use in determining the trophic state of a lake is the biomass of aquatic macrophytes (vascular plants and large non-planktonic algae). This is a missing feature since the trophic state of a lake is meant to express overall productivity, and aquatic macrophytes can comprise a substantial amount of the productivity in a lake. Lakes that have large densities of aquatic macrophytes may have excellent water quality but may not be truly oligotrophic because they have high productivity in the form of macrophytes instead of algae. For this reason the Trophic State Index values should only be used as an indicator of water quality, not the overall trophic condition in lakes that have abundant aquatic macrophytes. Aquatic macrophytes are generally considered desirable because they improve wildlife habitat and can have a positive effect on water quality. Macrophytes are considered undesirable when densities reach excessive levels that interfere with lake uses. Also, some macrophytes, especially exotics such as hydrilla and water hyacinths, have the potential to cause severe water quality problems such as low dissolved oxygen and high organic loading, if densities are not monitored and controlled. CHEMICAL
CHARACTERISTICS In addition to using Trophic State Index values as indicators of water quality, there are numerous other individual chemical constituents that impact water quality. The parameters the City includes in its monitoring program, and the results of the 2001 lake survey are as follows:
Phosphorus is
an essential nutrient but in high concentrations can lead to rapid lake
eutrophication that results in excessive algae and aquatic plant growth.
A major source of phosphorus in urban lakes is from stormwater
runoff that transports phosphorus to lakes from lawns, driveways and
streets. High levels of
phosphorus in a lake may also result from naturally occurring deposits in
the soils of a lake watershed. The
total phosphorus concentrations in City lakes ranged from an absolute
minimum value of <0.005 mg/l in Lake Nona to an absolute maximum value
of 0.263 mg/l in Lake Davis. The
median value was 0.034 mg/l based on average annual data.
A commonly used critical level for phosphorus, above, which a lake
is considered to have the potential for trophic related problems, is 0.050
mg/l (Brezonik 1984). Based
on these criteria, 38.4% of City lakes had phosphorus levels, which can
cause trophic related water quality problems (Table
2).
Orthophosphate
is a soluble form of phosphorus that can be directly utilized by algae and
aquatic plants, as opposed to total phosphorus, which also measures forms
of phosphorus that are temporarily unavailable for plant growth.
Orthophosphate levels ranged from an absolute minimum value of
<0.004 mg/l to an absolute maximum value of 0.124 mg/l in Lake Como.
Orthophosphate concentrations were generally low with a median value of
<0.004 mg/l.
Nitrogen
is a nutrient, which along with phosphorus can have a significant impact
on the productivity of a lake. Nitrogen
can be introduced into a lake from pollution such as stormwater runoff or
from natural sources such as rainfall or groundwater.
Some types of algae and bacteria are capable of nitrogen fixation,
which converts atmospheric nitrogen gas to forms of nitrogen that can be
utilized by plants. Total
nitrogen values ranged from an absolute minimum value of 0.14 mg/l in Lake
Theresa to an absolute maximum of 5.80 mg/l in Lake Davis.
The median value was 0.78 mg/l.
A commonly used critical value for nitrogen is 1.00 mg/l (Brezonik
1984). Using this criterion,
28.6% of City lakes have average nitrogen levels that can cause trophic
related water quality problems.
Ammonia
is a nitrogen compound that can be directly utilized by algae and larger
aquatic plants. Ammonia levels were generally low with a median value of
<0.02 mg/l. The maximum
value for ammonia was 0.33 mg/l in Lake Como.
Nitrates
and nitrites are inorganic forms of nitrogen that can be utilized by
algae, but generally to a lesser degree than ammonia (Wetzel 1983).
Nitrate values ranged from <0.01 mg/l to 0.45 in Lake Como.
The median value for nitrate was <0.02 mg/l.
Nitrite values were generally low with 51.6% of the lake having
average values below the detection limit of <0.005 mg/l.
The maximum nitrite value was 0.399 mg/l in Lake Lurna.
The ratio of total nitrogen to total phosphorus can be used to
determine the limiting nutrient in a lake.
The limiting nutrient is the nutrient in low concentration with
respect to other nutrients. For
example, if algae needs ten (10) parts nitrogen to one (1) part phosphorus
and there is an excess of nitrogen with respect to phosphorus, then the
addition of nitrogen should not increase growth as long as more phosphorus
does not become available. In
this case phosphorus is the limiting nutrient and efforts to decrease
productivity should involve phosphorus removal.
Determination of the limiting nutrient is generally done using the
criteria that lakes with nitrogen to phosphorus ratios >30 are
phosphorus limited. Lakes with nitrogen to phosphorus ratios <10 are nitrogen
limited and lakes with ratios between 10 and 30 are balanced.
Based on these criteria, the majority (60.4%) of City lakes are
balanced, so reductions in phosphorus or nitrogen should reduce
productivity. Phosphorus and nitrogen limited lakes comprised 28.6% and
12.1% of the lakes respectively.
Chlorophyll‑a is a
pigment present in all green plants and is used to measure the densities
of planktonic algae. High
chlorophyll‑a values indicate high planktonic algae densities, which
is a result of excessive nutrients in the water. Algae blooms are the most
common cause of water quality problems in City lakes.
Algae have the potential to change the apparent color of water and
result in undesirable appearances such as surface scum.
In addition to creating unaesthetic appearances, high algae
densities can alter water chemistry such as depleting dissolved oxygen
during low light conditions and elevating pH values due to high rates of
photosynthesis. Chlorophyll‑a
values were extremely variable in City lakes with values ranging from
<0.5 mg/m3 in multiple lakes to 221 mg/m3 in Lake
Davis. The median value of
chlorophyll‑a was 17.3 mg/m3.
Chlorophyll‑a values greater than 20 mg/m3 are
commonly used to identify problem lakes. Using these criteria 45.1 % of the City lakes have algae
associated problems.
Secchi depth is a
measure of the water transparency in a lake. Even though transparency is
not a chemical measurement, it is influenced by water chemistry.
In general, increasing nutrient levels result in increased
planktonic algae densities, which in turn decrease water transparency. Other factors that affect transparency are water color and
suspended solids. The secchi
depth is obtained by lowering a standard size white and black disc into
the water column until it is no longer visible.
Secchi depth is a very good indicator of water quality and anyone
can easily collect this data to monitor lake water for changes.
Secchi depths range from 0.1 m (0.3 ft) in Lake Kozart to 5.0 m
(16.4 ft) in Spring Lake Northwest. The median value for secchi depth was
1.0 m (3.3 ft).
The Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) is a measure of the potential for
oxygen uptake by organic and inorganic materials in the water.
Elevated BOD values indicate the presence of high concentrations of
oxygen demanding substances in a lake. High BOD concentrations are
undesirable because there is a potential for oxygen depletion, which will
result in water quality problems such as fish kills and increased nutrient
release from the sediments. BOD
values ranged from <2.0 mg/l to 19.0 mg/l in Lake Lawsona.
The median value was 3.1 mg/l.
The pH value of water is
a measure of acidity or alkalinity. While
pure water has a pH value of 7.0, surface waters can vary considerably
into the acid or alkaline range from natural causes.
The majority of lakes were alkaline with 92.3% having average pH
values greater than 7.0. The
range of pH values was from 4.6 in Lake Nona to 9.6 in Lake Davis. The median value for pH was 7.9.
Lakes with high pH values tended to be eutrophic with the highest
values occurring in hypereutrophic lakes.
This is to be expected because carbon dioxide concentrations can be
reduced in the water column due to high rates of photosynthesis by
planktonic algae, which in turn increases the pH.
The alkalinity of a lake
refers to the quantity of compounds that shift the pH to the alkaline side
of the pH range. The higher
the alkalinity, the more resistance exists for pH shifts to the acidic
range. Generally, lakes with
an alkalinity below 40 mg/l are considered softwater lakes and lakes with
an alkalinity over 40 mg/l are considered hardwater lakes.
Softwater lakes have reduced resistance to pH changes because of
low concentrations of bicarbonates, carbonates, and hydroxides that
function as buffering agents. Hardwater
lakes tend to be more productive (eutrophic) than softwater lakes.
The majority of Orlando's lakes can be considered hardwater lakes
with 42.9% having alkalinity values over 40 mg/l.
Orlando's lakes have higher alkalinity than Florida lakes in
general. A study of 165
Florida lakes found that less than 25% had alkalinity values greater than
40 mg/l (Canfield and Hoyer, 1981). The
range of alkalinity values for Orlando lakes was <0.5 mg/l in Lake Red
to 144.0 mg/l in Lake of the Woods. The
median value for alkalinity was 44.0 mg/l.
Alkalinity is a good indicator of a lake’s susceptibility to
acidification from atmospheric depositions such as acid rain.
Lakes with total alkalinity values below concentrations of 10 mg/l
are considered sensitive to acid deposition, where as lakes with values
between 10 mg/l and 20 mg/l are considered moderately susceptible (Brenner
et. al., 1990).
Using this criterion only 5.5% of City lakes are highly susceptible
to acidification, 6.6% are moderately susceptible and 87.9% have a low
susceptibility to acidification. The Orlando lakes with the lowest alkalinity are Red Lake,
Lake Nona, and Mud Lake which all have values < 4.0 mg/l. These lakes
are a group of almost pristine softwater lakes located in southeast
Orlando.
Dissolved solids
are a measure of the amount of organic and inorganic material in solution.
These materials are mainly bicarbonates, chlorides, sulfates,
magnesium and sodium with concentrations generally less than 200 mg/l in
Central Florida lakes (Swihart et al.,
1984). Orlando lakes are
typical of Central Florida lakes with all but five lakes having average
dissolved solid values below 200 mg/l.
Lake Sandy had the highest average dissolved solids at 277 mg/l
followed by Lake of the Woods with 270 mg/l. The absolute range for
dissolved solids were 26 mg/l in Lake Nona to 500 mg/l in Red Lake.
The median dissolved solids value was 130 mg/l.
Total suspended solids
and volatile suspended solids are measures of the solid material
suspended in water. Volatile
solids indicate the organic fraction of total solids.
The suspended solids in the majority of the lakes are organic in
nature with only three lakes having less than one-half of the measured
total suspended solids in the volatile fraction.
The higher values for solids were found in lakes with high
planktonic algae densities which indicates that most of the suspended
solids materials is composed of algal cells.
Total suspended solids ranged from <1.0 mg/l to a maximum value
of 70 mg/l in Lake Kozart. The
median value for total suspended solids was 4.2 mg/l.
Suspended solids are important indicators of water quality because
high levels entering a lake have the potential to cause severe water
quality problems. Pollutants
such as heavy metals and phosphorus tend to bind to solids and are carried
into lakes via stormwater runoff or from construction activities. Erosion from construction activity can cause severe water
quality problems resulting from solids entering a lake.
Specific conductivity
is a measurement of the total amounts of ionized substances dissolved in
water. High values for
conductivity can be natural or caused by land use activities or discharges
of contaminated water. Orlando's lakes tend to have higher conductivity than Florida
lakes in general. A survey of
165 Florida lakes conducted by Canfield and Hoyer (1981) found a median
conductivity value of 97 umhos@ 250C. The median value for Orlando was 190 umhos@ 250C
with a range of 56 umhos@ 250C in Lake Kelly to 552 umhos@ 250C
in Lake Sandy.
Water quality data collected for the past ten years indicate the
overall water quality is fairly constant in City lakes (Table
3).
A comparison of median concentrations from 1991-2001 does indicate
annual variation but no overall increasing or decreasing trends.
PHYSICAL
CHARACTERISTICS Morphological
features such as size, shape, and depth have significant effects on the
water quality of a lake. Most
Florida lakes are solution lakes, which were formed through sinkhole
activity (Swihart et al., 1984). This is the reason that the majority of the City's lakes are
circular in shape. Other
characteristics of solution lakes are highly variable depths and
tendencies to undergo fluctuations in water level in response to changes
in the groundwater table (Wetzel, 1983).
Size and depth are factors that determine if a lake will develop
thermal stratification, which in turn can have an impact on nutrient and
dissolved oxygen levels. Thermal stratification is the process in which a lake
develops a layer of denser cooler water that underlies a surface layer of
less dense, warmer water. The
lower layer of water is termed the hypolimnion, the upper warmer layer is
the epilimnion and the transitional layer, which acts as a barrier between
the two, is the metalimnion. The
metalimnion, which is also called a thermocline, is usually identified by
a temperature change of 10C per meter (Wetzel, 1983).
The hypolimnion does not mix with surface waters and tends to
become stagnant. The
hypolimnion will become anoxic with time, which can cause sediment bound
phosphorus to be released to the water column.
Water quality problems can occur when stratification occurs in
lakes with nutrient rich bottom sediments.
When the metalimnion is eliminated and the nutrient-rich anoxic
waters of the hypolimnion mix throughout the lake, algal blooms can occur.
This is a common phenomenon in northern temperate lakes, which tend to
develop stable stratification that persist throughout the winter and
summer and mix in the fall and spring.
Stable stratification occurs much less frequently in Florida's
semi‑tropical lakes because most of our lakes are shallow enough to
be mixed by wind and the temperature differences between seasons are
relatively small.
Field data collected during the past several years indicates that
stratification is somewhat common in City lakes.
Using the criteria of the presence of a metalimnion, identified by
a temperature difference of 10C per meter, 67.4% of Orlando's
lakes exhibited thermal stratification during at least one quarterly
sampling event in 2001 and 39.5% were stratified on more than one sampling
event.
Small differences in temperature between the top and bottom of the
water column indicate that most of the City's lakes are either not
stratified or very weakly stratified the majority of the year.
A total of 57.0% of the lakes had average temperature differences
of <20C between top and bottom.
The range for average temperature difference between top and bottom
was 0.050C to 9.7 0C and the median value was 1.60C
(Table 4). Only a few of the deeper lakes
develop stable stratification. Average
temperature differences >50C between top and bottom were
present in 16.3% of the lakes in 2001.
The majority of the lakes that exhibited thermal stratification
could be classified as polymitic (the lake stratifies and mixes multiple
times throughout the year). Lakes
with weak stratification mix with a minimum amount of disturbance such as
a moderate wind. Data indicated that stratification can be present any
time of year and the time of year it occurs, fluctuates on an annual
basis. During 1994, 1995,
1996, and 2000 stratification was observed most frequently during the
months of February. During
1997, 1998, and 1999 stratification was observed most frequently during
the May - July time period. In
2001,
stratification occurred the most in August.
Even though stratification was usually unstable and did not persist
for long periods of time, the hypolimnion tended to become low in oxygen.
During periods of stratification, bottom dissolved oxygen below 1.0
mg/l was observed 60.3% of the time. Despite the fact that the majority of
the lakes did not exhibit stable thermal stratification, low dissolved
oxygen was common in the lower water columns.
Dissolved oxygen values of <3.0 mg/l occurred in 96.6% of the
lakes at an average depth of 4.6 m. Anoxic conditions on the bottom of
lakes were common with bottom dissolved oxygen values of <1.0 mg/l
occurring in 70.9% of the lakes. Most
game fish could not survive in the lower levels of these lakes.
The range and median value of dissolved oxygen on the bottom was
0.0 mg/l to 15.1 mg/l and 2.5 mg/l respectively, as opposed to surface
values ranging from 0.1 mg/l to 13.8 mg/l with a median value of 8.3 mg/l.
Even though low dissolved oxygen values were more prevalent in
lakes that exhibited thermal stratification, low values were also common
in lakes that were not stratified.
Mechanical aeration units, which consist of a compressor and
diffuser, were present in 24 of the lakes surveyed.
Of the lakes with aeration, 45.8% had average temperature
differences between top and bottom of
<10C as opposed to 27.4% for non-aerated lakes.
This indicates that aeration tends to reduce stratification.
Surface temperatures in City lakes ranged from 11.90C
(53.40F) to 32.80C (91.0 0F) with a
median value of 25.30C (77.50F).
Maximum
water temperatures occurred in August, and minimum water temperatures
occurred in January.
WATER
QUALITY TRENDS
The
most important reason for having an ongoing water quality program is for
the determination of changes in water quality over time.
Lakes naturally fluctuate in water chemistry and quality between
seasons and from year to year. Differences
in factors such as water temperature, sunlight intensity and rainfall
patterns are responsible for these fluctuations.
Because of natural and random fluctuations, long term monitoring
data is required to identify overall changes in water quality over time.
The City has had a comprehensive monitoring program since 1990, so
we are becoming increasingly accurate in detecting trends in water
quality. Changes
in water quality over time are determined using regression analysis, which
is a simple model for the relationship between two variables.
The relationships of changes in Florida Trophic State Index values
over time are used to determine water quality trends. This analysis
generates a regression line, which indicates whether there is a positive
or negative relationship between time and water quality, by the slope of
the line. Positive slopes
indicate increasing trophic states over time, which is undesirable.
Negative slopes indicate decreasing trophic states, which indicate
improvements. Regression
analysis generates a value called the coefficient of determination (R2),
which is used to measure the percent change, which is attributable to
time. For example a R2 of
0.40 would indicate that 40% of the change observed is correlated to
changes in time and the other 60% of change is due to other factors such
as random fluctuations. Coefficient
of determination values greater than 0.20 are considered significant by
the State of Florida for surface water trends (Swithart et. al. 1984).
Trend
determinations for Orlando lakes were done by assigning each lake a status
of improving, no trend, or degrading, depending on the line slope and R2
value for each regression analysis of trophic state versus time.
Improving trends were assigned to lakes with R2 values
of > 0.20 and decreasing trophic states.
No trend was assigned if the R2 value was <0.20.
A degrading trend was assigned for increasing trophic states and R2
values > 0.20. The
majority of lakes (83 out of 91) had at least 12 years of data with a
minimum of 4 sample events per year. Regression
analysis indicated that 11 (13.3%) of 83 City lakes have improving water
quality trends and 7 (8.4%) have degrading water quality trends (Table
5). The remaining 65
lakes did not show any significant change in water quality over time.
Lakes Beauty, George, Lawsona, and Sandy had the largest improvements in
water quality. Lakes
Fairview, Mann, Pamela and Weldona had the highest rates of declining
water quality. Even though
trend analysis indicates that some lakes are degrading, it is encouraging
that the vast majority of City lakes are maintaining their water quality
or improving. Further
research should be done on the lakes that are showing negative trends, to
determine the factors responsible for the changes, so that corrective
actions can be taken.
During
2001, the majority (67.0%) of City lakes had good water quality using
State criteria that Trophic State Index values (measures productivity of a
lake) of less than 60 indicate good water quality.
The percent of lakes with Trophic State Index values between
60‑69 was 24.2%, which is commonly used to indicate eutrophic
conditions and fair water quality. Hypereutrophic or poor water quality
conditions were found in 8.8% of the lakes.
The five lakes with the best water quality as measured by low
Trophic State Index values were Beauty, George, Nona, Spring Lake
(Southwest) and Susannah. Lake
George, Nona and Spring Lake (Southwest) have been ranked in the top five
since 1998. The five lakes
with the highest Trophic State Values were Bay, Kozart, Mann, Richmond and
Walker.
The majority (60.4%) of City lakes are nutrient balanced, so
reductions in phosphorus or nitrogen should reduce productivity.
Phosphorus limited lakes comprised 28.6% of the lakes sampled and 12.1%
were nitrogen limited.
The results of the monitoring program revealed that the majority of
City lakes are hardwater lakes with 92.3% of the lakes having average pH
values above 7.0 and 42.9% having mean total alkalinity values greater
than 40 mg/l. City lakes had
higher alkalinity and specific conductivity than Florida lakes in general. High alkalinity is desirable when acidification is a concern
since these lakes are less susceptible to pH changes resulting from
atmospheric deposition of acid. Only
5.5% of City lakes are highly susceptible to acidification, 6.6% are
moderately susceptible and 87.9% have a low susceptibility to
acidification.
Dissolved solids levels were typical of Central Florida lakes with
a median value of 130 mg/l. Total
suspended solids were generally low with a median value of 4.2 mg/l.
Temperature data from 2001 indicated that a substantial percent
(67.4%) of the lakes developed thermal stratification.
Most of these lakes could be considered polymitic, which means the
lake stratifies and mixes multiple times during the year.
Only a small percent (16.3%) of the lakes developed stable thermal
stratification identified by average annual temperature differences >50C
between top and bottom and the presence of a well-defined metalimnion.
During 2001, stratification occurred most frequently during the
month of August. During other years, stratification was observed most
frequently during winter months. This
data indicates that a large number of City lakes can stratify during
summer or winter months depending upon weather conditions.
Low dissolved oxygen and anoxic conditions on the lake bottoms were
more prevalent in lakes that exhibited thermal stratification, but also
occurred in non-stratified lakes. Dissolved
oxygen values of <3.0 mg/l occurred in 96.6% of the lakes at an average
depth of 4.6 m. Regression analysis indicated that 13.3% of the lakes have improving water quality trends and 8.4% have degrading trends. The remaining 78.3% of the lakes did not have any significant changes over the past several years.
LITERATURE
CITED Brezonik,
P.L. 1984. Trophic state indices: rational for multivariate approaches,
Pages 441-445 in Lake and Reservoir Management, October 18-23,
Knoxville Tenn. EPA 440/5-84-001 U.S. E.P.A.
Washington, D.C.
Canfield
and Hoyer. 1988. Regional geology and the chemical and trophic state
characteristics of Florida lakes, Lake and Reservoir Management Soc., 4(1)
21-23 pp.
Hand and Paulic. 1992. Florida Water Quality Assessment 305 (b) Technical Appendix. Department of Environmental Regulation, 21 – 25 pp. Brenner
et al.
1990. Ecosystems of
Florida, University of Central Florida Press, 376 p.
Swihart
et al. 1984.
Water
Resource Atlas of Florida, FL.
Institute of Science and Public Affairs, 77 p.
Wetzel,
R.G. 1983.
Limnology. The Dryden Press, 75 p. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||